<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Joey&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://josephbales.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://josephbales.com</link>
	<description>Correlation ≠ Causation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:13:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Sabbatical by melo</title>
		<link>http://josephbales.com/2009/09/17/sabbatical/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>melo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephbales.com/?p=732#comment-153</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had the blog blahs for a few months, too.  See you on Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had the blog blahs for a few months, too.  See you on Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Working sucks by Landshark</title>
		<link>http://josephbales.com/2009/08/11/working-sucks/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Landshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephbales.com/?p=728#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Such decisions are generally made by corporate suits with no real-world experience; &quot;run the numbers&quot; is the only thing they can do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such decisions are generally made by corporate suits with no real-world experience; &#8220;run the numbers&#8221; is the only thing they can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The end is nigh by Joey</title>
		<link>http://josephbales.com/2009/07/21/the-end-is-nigh/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephbales.com/?p=725#comment-151</guid>
		<description>If those people are our only hope, I&#039;m not sure we are worth saving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If those people are our only hope, I&#8217;m not sure we are worth saving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The end is nigh by Landshark</title>
		<link>http://josephbales.com/2009/07/21/the-end-is-nigh/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Landshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephbales.com/?p=725#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry, Bruce Willis, Ben Affleck, and their gang of lovable misfits will save us.  It&#039;s not like they&#039;re doing anything else lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry, Bruce Willis, Ben Affleck, and their gang of lovable misfits will save us.  It&#8217;s not like they&#8217;re doing anything else lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#039;s all the rage in Europe by Joey&#8217;s Crappy Day &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Microsoft will destroy the web&#8230; again</title>
		<link>http://josephbales.com/2009/06/06/its-all-the-rage-in-europe/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey&#8217;s Crappy Day &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Microsoft will destroy the web&#8230; again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephbales.com/?p=714#comment-149</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m sooooo tired of nerdball, I&#8217;m kicking it to the curb with this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m sooooo tired of nerdball, I&#8217;m kicking it to the curb with this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trying Windows 7 by Landshark</title>
		<link>http://josephbales.com/2009/05/28/trying-windows-7/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Landshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephbales.com/?p=685#comment-147</guid>
		<description>To make the numbering scheme even MORE confusing, the kernel version for Windows 7 is 6.1.

I&#039;ve been using Windows 7 as my primary desktop since Beta 1 (even then it was better than Vista), and I have been very pleased.  Aside from a few minor software incompatibilities (which are usually fooled by &quot;Compatibility Mode&quot;), everything works well, though I have fairly current hardware.  The shipping version will also include &quot;XP Mode&quot;, which is a virtualized, slimmed down version of XP for those few stubborn programs that still don&#039;t seem to work.  I think this is a road MS should have gone down long ago; many of the bloat and problems with Windows stem from MS&#039;s perceived need to make every OS backwards-compatible with every piece of software of the last 10 years.  Better to concentrate on maximizing the user experience on the current system, and let a virtual machine handle the legacy stuff.  They haven&#039;t accepted my other advice (get rid of activation, offer a multi-computer license option for homes with multiple pcs, introduce a linux-like package manager...)

And there is a simple partition manager if you select the &quot;Custom&quot; install option.  You&#039;re right, in an effort to make things easier for the &quot;average user&quot;, things are complicated for the experienced user because advanced options are often hidden.  They&#039;re still there, if you can find them.  Maybe MS should offer a &quot;Power mode&quot; where all is revealed (perhaps it would be called &quot;Regedit&quot; :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To make the numbering scheme even MORE confusing, the kernel version for Windows 7 is 6.1.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using Windows 7 as my primary desktop since Beta 1 (even then it was better than Vista), and I have been very pleased.  Aside from a few minor software incompatibilities (which are usually fooled by &#8220;Compatibility Mode&#8221;), everything works well, though I have fairly current hardware.  The shipping version will also include &#8220;XP Mode&#8221;, which is a virtualized, slimmed down version of XP for those few stubborn programs that still don&#8217;t seem to work.  I think this is a road MS should have gone down long ago; many of the bloat and problems with Windows stem from MS&#8217;s perceived need to make every OS backwards-compatible with every piece of software of the last 10 years.  Better to concentrate on maximizing the user experience on the current system, and let a virtual machine handle the legacy stuff.  They haven&#8217;t accepted my other advice (get rid of activation, offer a multi-computer license option for homes with multiple pcs, introduce a linux-like package manager&#8230;)</p>
<p>And there is a simple partition manager if you select the &#8220;Custom&#8221; install option.  You&#8217;re right, in an effort to make things easier for the &#8220;average user&#8221;, things are complicated for the experienced user because advanced options are often hidden.  They&#8217;re still there, if you can find them.  Maybe MS should offer a &#8220;Power mode&#8221; where all is revealed (perhaps it would be called &#8220;Regedit&#8221; :))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Weather Channel FAIL by melo</title>
		<link>http://josephbales.com/2009/06/02/the-weather-channel-fail/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>melo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephbales.com/?p=710#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Encrypted text files on Mac OS X by John W</title>
		<link>http://josephbales.com/2009/01/05/encrypted-text-files-on-mac-os-x/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>John W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephbales.com/?p=414#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Joey,
You might want to reconsider using Vim to encrypt your passwords. According to the documentation, the encryption used is relatively weak: http://www.vim.org/htmldoc/editing.html#encryption
&quot;The algorithm used is breakable.  A 4 character key in about one hour, a 6
  character key in one day (on a Pentium 133 PC).&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joey,<br />
You might want to reconsider using Vim to encrypt your passwords. According to the documentation, the encryption used is relatively weak: <a href="http://www.vim.org/htmldoc/editing.html#encryption" rel="nofollow">http://www.vim.org/htmldoc/editing.html#encryption</a><br />
&#8220;The algorithm used is breakable.  A 4 character key in about one hour, a 6<br />
  character key in one day (on a Pentium 133 PC).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Holy crap! by melo</title>
		<link>http://josephbales.com/2009/04/08/holy-crap/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>melo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephbales.com/?p=667#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Why do I suddenly have visions of flopping goldfish?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do I suddenly have visions of flopping goldfish?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Holy crap! by Landshark</title>
		<link>http://josephbales.com/2009/04/08/holy-crap/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Landshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://josephbales.com/?p=667#comment-145</guid>
		<description>wh-wh-whaa?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wh-wh-whaa?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
